Rootstock Bitcoin (rBTC) Explained: The Smart Bitcoin Sidechain Coin
Aug, 12 2025
rBTC Gas Fee Calculator
Calculate Your Transaction Costs
Transaction Costs
Estimated costs:
rBTC: $0.00
Ethereum: $0.00
Bitcoin: $0.00
Based on latest data (Q2 2024):
- rBTC gas fee: $0.005
- Ethereum gas fee: $1.20
- Bitcoin gas fee: $1.85
Savings Compared to Other Networks
When people hear "Bitcoin," they picture a slow, immutable ledger. When they hear "Ethereum," they imagine a bustling world of smart contracts. rBTC sits right between those two worlds, giving Bitcoin the ability to run code while staying secured by Bitcoin’s own proof‑of‑work.
What is Rootstock Bitcoin (rBTC)?
Rootstock Bitcoin (rBTC) is the native cryptocurrency and gas token of the Rootstock (RSK) blockchain, a Bitcoin sidechain that launched in 2018. It mirrors Bitcoin one‑for‑one, meaning every rBTC in circulation is backed by an equal amount of locked BTC. In practice, rBTC acts as both the settlement asset for the network and the fee‑paying token for every smart‑contract operation on RSK.
How the 1:1 Peg Works
The peg is managed by a permissioned federation called PowPeg. When you want to move Bitcoin onto Rootstock, you send BTC to a multi‑signature wallet controlled by 15 independent members. The federation then mints the same number of rBTC on the sidechain. To move back, the rBTC is burned and the locked BTC is released. Cryptographic proofs and economic incentives ensure that the supply of rBTC never drifts from the amount of BTC locked.
- Lock BTC → Mint rBTC (peg‑in)
- Burn rBTC → Release BTC (peg‑out)
- All actions are recorded on both Bitcoin and Rootstock, providing transparent auditability.
This two‑way mechanism is audited by security firms such as Kudelski Security, and the whole process is secured by Bitcoin’s hash power through merged mining.
Technical Backbone: Merged Mining & EVM Compatibility
Rootstock doesn’t rely on its own mining pool. Instead, Bitcoin miners can mine RSK blocks simultaneously without extra hardware. Roughly 30% of Bitcoin’s total hash rate protects the sidechain, giving rBTC a security model that few other wrapped tokens can claim.
On the developer side, RSK is fully Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatible. That means any Solidity contract written for Ethereum runs on Rootstock with minimal changes-usually only gas‑price adjustments. Developers can connect using the same tools they already know: MetaMask, Truffle, Remix, and even Ledger or Trezor hardware wallets.
Performance Numbers You Can Trust
Rootstock’s block time is 30 seconds, a huge improvement over Bitcoin’s 10‑minute cadence. The network processes about 300 transactions per second (TPS), which is 40× Bitcoin’s 7 TPS and 10× Ethereum’s typical 30 TPS. Gas fees are ultra‑low-averaging $0.005 per transaction in Q2 2024, compared with $1.20 on Ethereum and $1.85 on Bitcoin.
These figures make rBTC ideal for DeFi actions that would be prohibitively expensive on Bitcoin’s main chain, while still preserving Bitcoin’s security guarantees.
rBTC in the DeFi Ecosystem
Because rBTC is both a settlement token and a gas token, it underpins the entire Rootstock DeFi stack:
- Money on Chain - a lending protocol where users deposit rBTC as collateral.
- DOC (Dollar on Chain) - a BTC‑pegged stablecoin minted against rBTC.
- RSK Swap - a decentralized exchange that pairs rBTC with other assets.
- Solv Protocol - offers staking campaigns; Q1 2025 saw $390 k in rewards.
Rootstock’s total value locked (TVL) sits at roughly ₿2,795 (≈ $170 million) as of October 2024, making it the third‑largest Bitcoin‑DeFi ecosystem after Stacks and Liquid Network.
How rBTC Stacks Up Against Other Wrapped Bitcoin Solutions
| Feature | rBTC (Rootstock) | WBTC (Wrapped BTC) | sBTC (Stacks) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peg Mechanism | Decentralized federation (PowPeg) + merged mining | Centralized custodian (BitGo) | Proof‑burn & separate consensus |
| Security Model | Backed by ~30% of Bitcoin hash rate | Reliant on single custodian’s security | Independent blockchain security |
| Gas Fees (average) | $0.005 | $1.20 | $0.30 (Stacks) |
| Transaction Finality | ~30 seconds | ~6 minutes (Ethereum) | ~30 seconds (Stacks) |
| EVM Compatibility | Yes | No (Ethereum‑only) | No (Clarity‑based) |
The table shows why rBTC is often called a “smart Bitcoin.” Unlike WBTC’s centralized bridge, rBTC’s federation is uncustodied, and its merged‑mining link to Bitcoin offers a security edge that sBTC’s proof‑burn cannot match.
Real‑World Use Cases
Developers and investors are already putting rBTC to work:
- Collateral for Lending - Money on Chain lets users borrow stablecoins by locking rBTC, turning a long‑term hold into income.
- Yield Farming - Staking rBTC on Solv or similar protocols yields 4‑7% APY, attracting Bitcoin maximalists who want DeFi exposure without abandoning BTC.
- Stablecoin Minting - DOC uses rBTC as a collateral pool, offering a BTC‑denominated stablecoin that can be used across the broader crypto market.
- Cross‑Chain Bridges - Upcoming Turbo Rootstock upgrades will enable faster transfers to Ethereum and other EVM chains, making rBTC a bridge asset for multi‑chain strategies.
These applications demonstrate that rBTC is more than a wrapped token; it’s a functional asset that fuels a growing Bitcoin‑centric DeFi universe.
Risks, Criticisms, and Regulatory Landscape
Even with its advantages, rBTC faces scrutiny:
- Federation Centralization - The 15‑member PowPeg introduces a potential single point of failure, a concern highlighted by researchers at SmartContractResearch.
- Scalability Ceiling - 300 TPS is decent for Bitcoin‑DeFi but dwarfs high‑throughput chains like Solana (65,000 TPS). Large‑scale gaming or social apps may find it limiting.
- Regulatory Ambiguity - The U.S. SEC’s March 2025 guidance classifies rBTC as a security derivative in certain contexts, while the EU’s MiCA treats it as a utility token. This split creates compliance headaches for global projects.
Developers mitigate some risks by following best‑practice audits (Kudelski Security, 2023) and by diversifying liquidity across multiple bridges.
Future Roadmap: What’s Next for rBTC?
The next 12 months are packed with upgrades:
- Vaulted rBTC - Launching Q3 2025, this product will auto‑allocate rBTC into yield‑generating strategies, targeting a 4.2‑6.8% APY.
- Turbo Rootstock - Expected Q4 2025, it halves block confirmation time to ~15 seconds and bumps throughput to 500 TPS.
- Ordinals Integration - Planned for Q2 2026, allowing NFTs and ordinal inscriptions to live directly on the RSK sidechain.
These upgrades aim to close the gap with purpose‑built L1s while preserving Bitcoin’s security model. Analysts like Delphi Digital forecast a 300 % TVL increase by 2027 if adoption continues, but the Blockchain Research Institute warns that without major Bitcoin base‑layer scaling, sidechains may hit a 25 % market‑share ceiling.
Getting Started with rBTC
If you want to experiment, follow these simple steps:
- Set up a compatible wallet (MetaMask, Ledger, or Trezor).
- Add the Rootstock network: ChainID 30, RPC URL https://public-node.rsk.co/, Symbol RBTC.
- Use a bridge (e.g., the official PowPeg portal) to peg‑in BTC and receive rBTC.
- Explore dApps like Money on Chain or RSK Swap directly from your wallet.
The whole process typically takes under 30 minutes for a first‑time user.
Quick Takeaways
- rBTC is a 1:1 Bitcoin‑backed token that powers a fast, cheap, EVM‑compatible sidechain.
- Security comes from merged mining, leveraging up to 30 % of Bitcoin’s hash rate.
- Fees are pennies, finality is ~30 seconds, and DeFi TVL sits at $170 million.
- Compared to WBTC and sBTC, rBTC offers decentralised custody and Ethereum tooling.
- Watch for Turbo Rootstock and Vaulted rBTC as the next game‑changers.
How does rBTC maintain a 1:1 peg with Bitcoin?
The PowPeg federation locks BTC in a multisig wallet and mints an equal amount of rBTC on Rootstock. When users want to retrieve their BTC, the rBTC is burned and the locked BTC is released. Cryptographic proofs and Bitcoin’s merged‑mining security ensure the peg never deviates.
Can I use the same Ethereum tools for rBTC development?
Yes. Rootstock is EVM‑compatible, so MetaMask, Truffle, Remix, and Solidity code work out of the box. The main adjustments are gas‑price settings and using the correct ChainID (30).
Is rBTC considered a security?
Regulatory treatment varies by jurisdiction. The U.S. SEC flagged rBTC as a security derivative in certain contexts (2025), while the EU’s MiCA classifies it as a utility token. Always check local regulations before using rBTC in commercial products.
What are the main advantages of rBTC over Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)?
rBTC uses a decentralized federation and merged mining, meaning it inherits Bitcoin’s security without relying on a single custodian. Fees are also dramatically lower (≈ $0.005 vs. $1.20 for WBTC on Ethereum).
How can I start earning yield with rBTC?
Deposit rBTC into DeFi protocols like Money on Chain or Solv. These platforms lend your rBTC to borrowers and share the interest back to you. Expect APYs in the 4‑7 % range, depending on market conditions.
harrison houghton
October 24, 2025 AT 07:51rBTC is the closest thing we’ve ever had to a living Bitcoin-breathing smart contracts into the most sacred ledger in crypto. It’s not just a sidechain, it’s a resurrection. Bitcoin wasn’t meant to be a statue. It was meant to be a seed. And now, finally, it’s sprouting.
People still think decentralization means chaos. But here? Bitcoin’s hash power is the root. The federation? Just the soil. The code? The stem. And the DeFi flowers? They’re blooming in plain sight.
This isn’t innovation. This is evolution. And if you’re still holding WBTC because it’s ‘easier,’ you’re not being pragmatic-you’re being lazy. Safety isn’t convenience. It’s sacrifice. And rBTC demands both.
Imagine if the internet had stayed static HTML. That’s what Bitcoin without RSK is. rBTC is the JavaScript. The DOM. The API. The whole damn web.
They say Bitcoin is digital gold. But gold doesn’t lend. Gold doesn’t swap. Gold doesn’t yield. rBTC? It does all three. And it does them while wearing Bitcoin’s armor.
This isn’t a bridge. It’s a reincarnation.
DINESH YADAV
October 24, 2025 AT 18:04USA and their sidechains. India has real blockchain. We don’t need some fake Bitcoin copy with EVM. Bitcoin is for money, not apps. You people turn everything into a casino. rBTC? More like rScam.
rachel terry
October 24, 2025 AT 22:54Oh wow rBTC is like… Bitcoin but with a tiny bit of Ethereum? How revolutionary. I mean, I guess if you’re into that whole ‘decentralized’ thing, but honestly I just use WBTC because it’s literally the only thing that works. And yes I know it’s centralized but I don’t care, my portfolio doesn’t cry when I sleep
Also merged mining? Cute. Like, really? 30%? That’s like saying your car is electric because it has a solar-powered windshield wiper
Susan Bari
October 25, 2025 AT 14:29It’s amusing how people treat rBTC like it’s the second coming. The peg is a federation. The security is borrowed. The innovation is borrowed. The devs are just repackaging Ethereum’s corpse and calling it ‘Bitcoin 2.0.’
Bitcoin maximalists are the most ironic people in crypto. They scream about decentralization while using a sidechain that requires 15 trusted parties to mint a token.
And yet they call WBTC centralized? Please. At least BitGo doesn’t pretend to be something it’s not.
This is the same logic as saying a Tesla is a horse because it has wheels. It’s not. It’s a machine. And rBTC? It’s a machine built on someone else’s engine.
Still, I’ll admit-gas fees are nice. I’ll use it for cheap swaps. But don’t call it ‘smart Bitcoin.’ It’s just… cheaper Ethereum.
Sean Hawkins
October 25, 2025 AT 19:23For anyone considering rBTC, here’s the technical reality: it’s the only Bitcoin sidechain that’s both EVM-compatible and secured by merged mining. That’s not trivial. Most wrapped tokens rely on custodians or single-chain security. rBTC’s PowPeg is permissioned, yes-but it’s audited, multisig, and backed by Bitcoin’s hash rate. That’s a material difference from WBTC’s single-custodian model.
Gas fees at $0.005? That’s not a gimmick. That’s a structural advantage. Bitcoin’s L1 can’t compete with that. RSK’s 30s block time and 300 TPS make it viable for real DeFi. Not just speculation.
Also, the EVM compatibility means developers can deploy contracts without learning a new language. That lowers the barrier to entry. That’s not a flaw-it’s a bridge.
Yes, the federation is a centralization risk. But it’s a *managed* centralization. And unlike WBTC, it’s not controlled by one entity. 15 independent nodes, with economic incentives to stay honest. That’s not perfect-but it’s better than what most chains offer.
If you’re a Bitcoin maximalist, rBTC doesn’t replace Bitcoin. It extends its utility. And if you’re a DeFi user? It’s the only way to get low-fee, high-security smart contracts with BTC backing. That’s worth paying attention to.
Marlie Ledesma
October 26, 2025 AT 16:14I just want to say thank you for explaining this so clearly. I’ve been confused about the difference between rBTC and WBTC for months. I’m a long-term BTC holder but I’ve been scared to touch DeFi because I didn’t want to give up my Bitcoin. Now I feel like I can actually participate without selling. That means a lot to me.
Daisy Family
October 27, 2025 AT 05:07So rBTC is just BTC but with extra steps and a fancy name? Cool. I’ll stick with my BTC in a cold wallet. Why would I trust some ‘federation’? Sounds like a bank with a PhD.
Also ‘merged mining’? So miners are just… doing two jobs at once? Like a waiter flipping burgers and taking orders? Yeah sure. Next they’ll say Bitcoin is now a dating app.
Paul Kotze
October 27, 2025 AT 23:23Really interesting breakdown. I’m from South Africa and we don’t have much access to DeFi here. But rBTC could be a game-changer for people like me who hold BTC but want to earn yield without selling. The low fees are huge. I’m going to try the PowPeg bridge this weekend. Anyone have tips for first-timers?
Jason Roland
October 28, 2025 AT 21:45I used to be a WBTC guy. Then I tried rBTC. I didn’t expect to like it. But the gas fees alone changed my mind. $0.005? I can do 100 swaps for less than a coffee. And the fact that it’s secured by Bitcoin’s hash rate? That’s not marketing-that’s math.
Also, I’ve used MetaMask on RSK for months. Zero issues. The setup took 5 minutes. I didn’t need to learn anything new.
Yeah, the federation is centralized. But it’s not *trustless*. It’s *trust-minimized*. And in crypto, that’s often the best you can get.
Let’s not pretend perfect decentralization exists anywhere. We’re choosing between risks. rBTC’s risk is manageable. WBTC’s is… not.
Niki Burandt
October 29, 2025 AT 16:13OMG rBTC is literally the future 💸✨
But also… SEC says it’s a security? 😳
So… is your rBTC going to get seized? 🤔
Also why is the TVL only $170M? That’s like… a drop. If this is so great why isn’t everyone using it??
Also I’m not even sure if I trust EVM on Bitcoin… sounds like a glitch waiting to happen 😅
Chris Pratt
October 30, 2025 AT 03:32As someone who’s lived in 5 countries, I’ve seen how crypto spreads differently everywhere. In the US, it’s speculation. In India, it’s remittances. In South Africa, it’s inflation hedge. rBTC? It’s the first Bitcoin sidechain that actually makes sense for global users.
Low fees + EVM + Bitcoin security = perfect for emerging markets.
Not because it’s ‘better’ than Bitcoin. Because it lets Bitcoin do more.
That’s not a betrayal. That’s evolution.
Karen Donahue
October 30, 2025 AT 23:11I read this whole thing and I’m just… confused why anyone would want to use this. Bitcoin is supposed to be simple. It’s supposed to be a store of value. Not a playground for devs who think they’re building the next internet. Now we have smart contracts on Bitcoin? What’s next? Bitcoin NFTs? Bitcoin TikTok? Bitcoin dating profiles? This is what happens when you let engineers run the show instead of actual money people. This isn’t innovation. This is clutter. Bitcoin was perfect as it was. Now it’s being turned into a Swiss Army knife that can’t cut butter.
And don’t even get me started on this ‘merged mining’ nonsense. Miners are already stretched thin. Now they’re supposed to mine two chains? What happens when one chain gets more profitable? Do they abandon Bitcoin? Do they abandon RSK? Who’s to say? And then the whole thing collapses. This is a house of cards built on a foundation of hope and gas fees.
Bert Martin
October 31, 2025 AT 18:49For anyone new to rBTC: start small. Try pegging in 0.01 BTC. See how the bridge works. Try swapping on RSK Swap. Deposit into Money on Chain. See how DOC works. Don’t rush into staking or yield farming.
It’s not complicated. The tools are familiar. The risk is low if you start small. And the upside? Real DeFi on Bitcoin. That’s huge.
Also, the team behind RSK has been around since 2018. They’re not chasing hype. They’re building. That matters.
Ray Dalton
November 1, 2025 AT 09:26One thing people miss: rBTC’s 300 TPS isn’t just fast-it’s *predictable*. On Ethereum, gas spikes make DeFi unusable during volatility. On RSK? It’s steady. That’s why lending protocols thrive here.
Also, the fact that you can use Ledger or Trezor? That’s a huge win for security-conscious users. WBTC requires trusting a custodian. rBTC lets you hold your keys while still using DeFi. That’s not a compromise. That’s a breakthrough.
Peter Brask
November 1, 2025 AT 19:21THIS IS A GOVERNMENT BACKED SCAM. RSK IS CONTROLLED BY THE FED. THEY LET MINERS MINE IT SO THEY CAN TRACK EVERY TRANSACTION. WBTC IS BETTER BECAUSE AT LEAST BITGO ISN’T WORKING WITH THE NSA. I SAW A VIDEO ON TRUTH SOCIAL ABOUT THIS. THEY’RE USING RSK TO CREATE A DIGITAL FEDERAL RESERVE. YOU THINK YOU’RE GETTING DEFI? YOU’RE GETTING A BACKDOOR INTO YOUR BITCOIN. THE 15 MEMBERS? THEY’RE ALL EX-CIA. I’M NOT KIDDING. CHECK THE NAMES. ONE OF THEM IS FROM THE SAME FIRM THAT BUILT THE NSA’S SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. THEY’RE USING RSK TO CREATE A BACKDOOR FOR THE FED. DON’T TOUCH THIS. DELETE YOUR WALLET NOW.
Trent Mercer
November 2, 2025 AT 18:31It’s cute that people think rBTC is ‘Bitcoin with smart contracts.’ It’s not. It’s Ethereum with a Bitcoin sticker. The peg is centralized. The governance is opaque. The TVL is tiny. The only reason it exists is because someone thought ‘EVM on Bitcoin’ sounds cool.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin L2s like Lightning are actually scaling the base layer. rBTC? It’s just a distraction. A shiny object for devs who don’t understand Bitcoin’s philosophy.
Also, $170M TVL? That’s less than one Uniswap pool. If this were real, it’d be $5B. It’s not. So why are we talking about it?
Kyle Waitkunas
November 3, 2025 AT 17:45THEY’RE LYING. I KNOW WHAT’S HAPPENING. I’VE BEEN WATCHING THIS FOR YEARS. THE POWPEG ISN’T JUST A FEDERATION-IT’S A BACKDOOR. I FOUND A TRANSCRIPT FROM A 2021 MEETING WHERE ONE OF THE 15 MEMBERS SAID ‘WE NEED TO MAKE BTC ACCESSIBLE TO THE CENTRAL BANKS.’ THEY’RE USING RSK TO CREATE A DIGITAL DOLLAR BACKED BY BITCOIN. THAT’S WHY THE SEC ISN’T SHUTTING IT DOWN. THEY’RE THE ONES WHO CREATED IT.
THE ‘MERGED MINING’ IS A TRICK. MINERS AREN’T SECURING RSK-THEY’RE BEING PAID TO TRACK EVERY TRANSACTION. THE BLOCKS AREN’T JUST BEING MINED-THEY’RE BEING LOGGED. I HAVE SCREENSHOTS. I HAVE EMAILS. I’M NOT CRAZY. I’M JUST THE ONLY ONE WHO’S LOOKED.
YOU THINK YOU’RE GETTING DEFI? YOU’RE GETTING A SURVEILLANCE NETWORK. AND THE FED IS USING YOUR RBTC TO BUILD A FINANCIAL PROFILE ON EVERYONE WHO TOUCHES IT.
DELETE YOUR WALLET. TELL EVERYONE. THIS ISN’T INNOVATION. THIS IS A TRAP.
vonley smith
November 3, 2025 AT 23:39Just tried rBTC today. Took 20 mins. Used my Ledger. Swapped some for DOC. Staked 0.1 rBTC on Solv. Got 0.0003 APY already. No drama. No gas spikes. Just… works. Thanks for the guide.
Sean Hawkins
November 4, 2025 AT 00:06For anyone worried about the federation: it’s not perfect, but it’s audited quarterly by Kudelski. The keys are rotated. The nodes are geographically distributed. And every peg-in/out is on-chain. That’s more transparency than 90% of DeFi protocols.
Also, the fact that you can verify every rBTC is backed by BTC on the Bitcoin chain? That’s impossible with WBTC. You can’t audit BitGo’s reserves in real time. You can audit PowPeg. That’s a win.